I'd kind of like to know what Tim Wharnsby is smoking in this article right here.
"There is belief the Maple Leafs have been zeroing in on New York Rangers defenceman Wade Redden and forward Peter Schaefer of the Boston Bruins"
This is why I hate offseason coverage, by the way. "There is belief by my son Zack and his Buzz Lightyear doll that the Leafs are coveting PJ Axelsson, in an effort to become more Swedish."
But seriously, Redden? We're talking about possibly one of the worst defensive contracts in the league Redden? The Redden who has been steadily depreciating in value since the lockout Redden?
If we're going after him, it better be because we're getting New York's 1st and Evgeny Grachev with him.
And on another note, Peter Schaefer? A 31 year-old who peaked when the Sens did, he spent all of last season buried in the minors because Boston can make better use of Shawn Thornton. The Leafs need many things, but if we need 30 year old checkers to put up 30 points why don't we just hang on to Devereaux and Hamilton? At least with Boyd we're supporting Toronto's indie music scene.
Is the logic there that Boston would love to get rid of Schaefer's 2.1 million (good lord who would pay him that much? Right, Bryan Murray) salary ? Because they didn't seem to have a problem just burying him in the minors ala Mark Bell.
The article goes on to talk goaltending, mentioning Burke's interest in JS Giguere. I hope he means he's interested in asking how his son's therapy is going, because there's no way we're paying 10 million for goaltending next year if Brunnstrom doesn't work out. Apparently the Leafs are on the list of teams that Giggy would accept a trade to, despite being about geographically as far away as you can get from his family (and son's medical needs). I guess making the teams you'd accept a trade to public is now de rigueur for players with a no trade clause.
*********
Filtering out all the BS, it's pretty obvious that these deals are being postulated because they help cap-tight teams shed salary. But the Redden deal would break Burke's previous statements about not wanting to carry salary past two years from now, as he's getting paid until 2014 (lol) and is of questionable value. The Giguere deal would work great... if we could sucker anybody into paying for a constantly injured and often average goalie in Toskala.
What I will say is I will be greatly surprised if the Leafs are still picking 7th come draft time. Burke has mentioned moving up, he's mentioned moving down, and someone out there will be willing to move with him. It's Burke's big chance to really put the pressure on other GMs and change the face of this team, and I can't believe he'll allow it to pass by.
FTB: A 2:00 p.m. Leafs game? In this economy?
-
At least the Jets don't have far to walk from Union Station to the arena.
3 hours ago
4 comments:
This is an absolutely stupid rumor. I'd be a better player for the Leafs than Peter Schaefer.
The only possible explanation for the Redden rumor is that some other team has vague interest, and somebody in NY is trying to make it sound like there's competition. Perhaps with Burke's OK.
If the Leafs even think about acquiring Wade Redden, I will bring back the fake Burke twitter and every post will just read "DURRRR, ME STUPID".
I heartily back DGB's stance if this move gets made or discussed. This is just someone making baseless rumours to get traffic and he's not even a blogger!
But Sick Kid's could more than take care of Jiggy's kid. Not that it makes sense to bring him.
This rumour makes no sense unless Burke was magically replaced by the spirit of JFJ.
Post a Comment